Comments on: Brownback: Was that really unconstitutional? Crap.

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 22 Dec 2006 03:55:34 +0000

Kudos for exercising your opinion.

By: KansasNate

KansasNate — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:18:34 +0000

Joe,

I do this because I like Kansas and I get pissed off that people like Brownback give the state a bad name.

As I have said many times, if Brownback was the nominee the Dems could run anyone to the right of Che Guevara and win in a landslide.

By: Joe

Joe — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:05:06 +0000

“What makes you think Iraq won’t still be an issue in 2008?”
–I never indicated that it wouldn’t. Unless Bush can clean it up pronto (or get the process heavily underway), it will still be a huge issue in ‘08.

By: vaara

vaara — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:17:53 +0000

“I thought Iraq was the reason the GOP lost”

What makes you think Iraq won’t still be an issue in 2008?

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:06:02 +0000

“…because the Democrats could run a container of rancid yogurt against Brownback and still win.”
–Then why dedicate your time to the savaging of Sam Brownback? If you’re confident Brownback won’t get the nod, then focus on someone who would and could win.

By: Joe

Joe — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:03:25 +0000

“Didn’t the 2006 election results teach you people anything? America doesn’t want theocracy.”
–What are you talking about? I thought Iraq was the reason the GOP lost; now it’s religiosity?? Quit throwing crap against the wall to see what sticks.

By: vaara

vaara — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 06:25:17 +0000

So would I, because the Democrats could run a container of rancid yogurt against Brownback and still win.

He’s a religious extremist. Didn’t the 2006 election results teach you people anything? America doesn’t want theocracy.

By: jon

jon — Wed, 20 Dec 2006 02:19:52 +0000

One can only hope Sam Brownback wins the GOP primaries.

This Neff nonsense is revolting. It’s significantly worse than asking a black nominee to recuse him- or herself from any cases involving affirmative action, miscegenation, etc.–it’s much more akin to demanding recusal from a nominee who has a black friend who RETROACTIVELY may have had an opportunity to gain some sort of enhancement through that structure!! What a bigot, panderer, simpleton.

That said, I’d much rather see a Brownback than a devil-in-disguise, like Romney or McCain, sneak into the general…

By: don

don — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 22:55:51 +0000

Oh, I think we’ve had enough of the Christian Right in our politics for a while. They’re not going to like it, but tough S. The new slogan will be “No Hypocrites in 2008″.

By: joshua

joshua — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:02:22 +0000

Iowa, after the elections of Congress, won’t vote for this individual. Also, Republicans who have called for a ‘re-focus’ of the Republican Party and those who have said they’ve ‘lost their ways’ would be completely reversing that thought should they seriously consider ‘Good Ole Sam’. Brownback is a moral opportunist, and will lose ground b/c his platform no longer works. He’s going to find out the hard way. Oh yea… how does a superior Catholic oppose abortion but still consider the death penalty? When it gets you votes, power, status, money… all the things Brown’s voters believe liberal have.