Anyone have any idea as to why Senator Sam Brownback would be introducing so many bills about shoe duties?
Late last week, Brownback introduced a total of 17 bills to suspend temporarily the duties on different types of footwear.
Among the offerings: S. 2847, to “reduce temporarily the duty on certain footwear with open toes or heels,” and the more catchall S. 2845, affecting “certain women’s footwear.” S. 2837, for the leather lover, would reduce the duty on “certain leather and textile footwear,” while S. 2838, affecting “certain rubber or plastic footwear,” keeps the pleather lover pleased.
Stay-at-home moms aren’t left out either: S. 2850 would “reduce temporarily the duty on certain house slippers.”
And on it goes, to cover certain footwear for men, certain other work footwear, certain athletic shoes and certain athletic footwear for men and boys.
We only got confused when it came to S. 2835, which would suspend the duty on “certain leather footwear for persons other than men or women.” Which leaves what, exactly? Humanoids? Extraterrestrials?
Thanks to The Hill for the heads up.
[powered by WordPress.]
Blogging Against Senator Sam Brownback Since March 2005
I am a student of political science at the University of Kansas. Contact me with any questions, comments or tips.
21 queries. 0.256 seconds
May 24th, 2006 at 10:32 am
These parallel a set of amendments and bills Jim Ryun pushed in the House. It seems to be Payless Shoes related.
June 22nd, 2006 at 2:45 pm
You might want to ask the Government Relations office at Payless Shoes, headquartered in Topeka, KS.