The Anti-Sam Brownback Blog

Senator Sam Brownback acts more like a presidential candidate every day. In December of last year a Quinnipiac Polling Institute poll showed when given a choice Americans preferred life in prison over the death penalty in cases of murder. At that point in time Brownback was a staunch death penalty supporter.

Brownback’s support of the death penalty goes way back to his days in the House of Representatives. In 1995 he voted yes on HR 729 which made it harder for persons convicted in State Court and given the death penalty to get a hearing in Federal Court on constitutional grounds. In 1996 he voted no on an amendment to HR 2703 which was trying to strengthen the right for a person given the death penalty in state court to appeal to a federal court.

His pro-death penalty pedigree has been well established for a long time and was not generally considered something that was likely to change. Then on Sunday a San Francisco Chronicle article reveals that ‘ole Sam may be moderating his tone. From the article:

“If we’re trying to establish a culture of life, it’s difficult to have the state sponsoring executions,” he told U.S. News & World Report this month. He also suggested that taxpayer funding for abortions and capital punishment should be eliminated.

Is this a part of the moderation that so many presidential hopefuls go through? Perhaps he is worried that his constituents will begin to see the hypocrisy in supporting the death penalty while giving lip service to the “culture of life.”

The key here is to not let Brownback get away with a giant “flip flop.” No news story about Brownback and the death penalty should be without prominent mention that he sung a different tune before becoming a presidential hopeful. Voters hate panderers almost as much as they hate hypocrites.

Senator Brownback’s main push in the international arena is the Sudan. I applaud him for discussing the conflict openly and for rightly calling it genocide. I’ll gloss over the fact that he is not as interested in similar deaths in other African nations. Perhaps his interest in Sudan comes from the evangelical lobbying groups in DC who advocate on behalf of the people in Darfur because in this case, unlike most others in Africa, the oppressed are Christians. Like I said, I’ll gloss over it.

Even on his pet project of Sudan Brownback is a hypocrite. He uses this issue just like he uses so many other issues. This morning on C-SPAN’s Washington journal Senators Brownback and Corzine were taking questions from the phones. His answer on one of the questions infuriated me.

The woman caller commented that last year when the genocide in Sudan finally started receiving international exposure the Senate spent three weeks debating gay marriage. She asked Brownback where his priorities are. An excellent question which pits one side of him against the other.

Brownback started his response by saying that 18 states have voted on this issue and the reason it is being brought up is that people think it is an important issue. He then goes on to spout some of his normal drivel about how children are best raised by two, heterosexual parents. Interesting to note that he said nothing about “loving parents.” Their sexuality is all that is important. Beat your kids if you want, just don’t be queer.

But I digress. He finished up his answer by saying:

We know in government that if you can get the basic [family] right you can move forward on a lot of other issues. If you get the basics wrong it’s like football; blocking and tackling. If you get those wrong, you can’t do a whole lot else. And that is why those issues are discussed. I realize people look at different priorities in different ways, but I think a lot of people around would consider that, would consider the discussion on Terri Schiavo and this issue and debate over quality of life being sacred per se is a monumental one. That you had a case study on and discussion in this country.

Excuse me. I think the 3000 people dying every day in Sudan would consider their quality of life a bit diminished. And thanks for reducing the 180,000 deaths in the Sudan to a political football game. He is all too willing to prioritize his hate of homosexuals over the deaths of Africans.

So blocking and tackling huh? I suppose the homosexual menace is killing 3000 innocent civilians every day right here in the US. It was so urgent that is needed to be debated for three weeks, and then not do a damn thing. Thank godness we headed off the impending disaster in the U.S. with our decisive inaction.

But hey, it’s not like we are the richest, most powerful nation in the world. Besides, we obviously are in an isolationist paradigm. No way we are sending troops to another country. We certainly have our own moral crusades to fight here at home. Generalismo Brownback, lead the way.

[Note: This post was originally written yesterday, 4-8-2005, but not posted until today as a result of an unfortunate series of computer problems.]

I wrote a DailyKos diary today about the anti gay marriage amendment in Kansas. As a result of the hangover I had from that experience there will unfortunately be no scathing Brownback critiques today.

I was not surprised when I saw that the speaker list for the Confronting the Judicial War on Faith Conference included Senator Brownback. This seems like an event where he would feel at home. While looking at the website, I noticed that Brownback was not listed on the schedule of events. Intrigued, I e-mailed the media contact asking for clarification.

I received an e-mail that said Brownback was not actually speaking at the event, nor attending it. The e-mail said that Brownback’s office led them on for weeks and then turned them down at the last minute.

Ever the intrepid net-journalist I called Brownback’s DC office for clarification. Had Brownback backed out of the event at the last moment? I spoke to Brownback’s scheduler who said Brownback turned the conference down weeks ago. She said that the conference advertised using Brownback’s name even before initially asking if he would attend. She further informed me that he would be in session and immediately following he would be flying back to Kansas.

So while I was salivating at the thought of ripping into Brownback for attending this conference, unfortunately it is not meant to be. Is this another sign of the GOP backing away from Crazy Delay and his Judiciary-lynching posse? Delay is the keynote speaker at the conference. Do note that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist today moderated his voice on the judiciary:

“I believe we have a fair and independent judiciary today,” said Frist, now trying to resolve a battle with Democrats over judicial nominations that threatens to tie his chamber into knots. “I respect that.”

Perhaps the wide-eyed and drooling maniacal face of Delay is starting to worry GOP leaders. For my part, I hope they line up behind Delay like kindergartners on the way to a bathroom break.

UPDATE 10:47pm CST

Courtesy of AmericaBlog comes news that Delay has pulled out of the conference. He is attending the Papal Funeral instead. Apparently during the same update of the site they took off Brownback’s name as well. On AmericaBlog’s cached copy Brownback’s name is clearly visible but a check of the current site shows it has been scrubbed.

While Delay has the Papal funeral as an excuse, Brownback was apparently snubbed by Frist and not invited to come with the US delegation. Interesting considering Brownback is about as Catholic as a lay-person can get. His ties to Opus Dei are well publicized.

For a short while, Ahmed Chalabi became one of the most well known faces of the Iraqi opposition groups. He was the head of the Iraqi National Congress (INC) which was a group of exiles working to overthrow Saddam. On the strength of the old adage “The enemy of my enemy is my friend” Chalabi became very important to the US intelligence gathering operations surrounding Iraq.

While Chalabi was making inroads with the US intelligence community, Brownback was sitting on the powerful Senate Foreign Relations committee. He repeatedly called Chalabi to testify to the mounting dangers of Saddam and WMDs. An article in the LA Times from April 8th 2003 illustrates how Brownback felt about Chalabi:

“I worked with him for a good five years. He is the only guy I’ve seen that is able to organize the Iraqi opposition and hold them together,” said Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “He’s bright and tireless and he really works at holding the big principles together.”

In 1998 Brownback co-sponsored The Iraqi Liberation Act which gave 3 million dollars to Chalabi’s INC for the purpose of weakening Saddam’s regime. While he was supporting the INC, he acknowledged they were not a perfect solution. In a January 3rd, 1999 New York Times article Brownback describes the INC by saying, “Every one of them has warts.”

During the ensuing war, Brownback complained that there was not enough of an “Iraqi face” on the operation. He went on to complain how the INC was not given the respect it deserved. Shortly after Chalabi was playing a key role in the reconstruction of Iraq.

We all know what has happened to Chalabi lately. He was accused of espionage and collaboration with the Iranians. He continues to deny that he passed cryptographic secrets to Iran. Brownback has never had to answer for his role in bringing credibility to Chalabi and aiding him in his deception of the west. In a Wichita Eagle article on October 23rd 2004 Brownback claims he has not spoken to Chalabi in “months.”

An excellent overview of the Chalabi - Brownback connection was written by Pitch Magazine in Kansas City. I would suggest this as a starting point. The wikipedia entry for Chalabi also gives good background information on the man and his deceptions.

You may remember in the myriad of stories last week about Brownback’s potential presidential run a mention of a New Hampshire speaking engagement he was to attend. He is speaking at the Cornerstone Policy Research’s “True Blue Breakfast.” According to Cornerstone’s site, the “True Blue” breakfast serves to “recognize New Hampshire legislators with a 100% score on our 2004 Scorecard for the 159th Session of the NH General Court.”

This seems pretty standard. Cornerstone is one of many rabid conservative groups that thrive off of anti-gay and anti-choice legislation. Their website contains position papers with far right ideas on everything from gays in the military to school vouchers. They lobby the NH state legislature to further their ideals.

The interesting parts came when researching Karen Testerman, the executive director of Cornerstone Policy Research. She has been involved in NH conservative politics for more than a few years. In 2003 Gov. Craig Benson nominated her to the state’s Commission on the Status of Women. This set off a firestorm of protest centered around her comments made on NH public radio. According to an Associated Press article on Oct 8, 2003, she compared “gays and lesbians with ’shoplifters and drug addicts.’” Testerman was eventually denied the post in a 3-2 vote by the executive council.

In addition to being rabidly anti-gay, she also has some unusual ideas about abstinence education. The fact that she supports abstinence only education should not come as a surprise. What is downright weird is her belief that holding hands leads to pre-marital sex and STDs. I kid you not. From the Concord Monitor on April 2, 2003:

A state committee advocating abstinence education is recommending that a “just say no” to sex message should be spread via community programs, according to a draft of its final report. During a meeting yesterday, the group also vowed to support programs that promote the social skills necessary to help young people avoid premarital sex.

“Holding hands is the first step,” said Karen Testerman, a committee member, “you’re not even supposed to do that if you can avoid it.”

I couldn’t make this stuff up if I tried. Wingnuttery at its best. So while you will probably never hear of the Cornerstone Research Institute again, remember the type of people who are shilling for Brownback. His new Campaign Slogan: Hands Off — Brownback in 08.

According to a Kansas City Star article, Brownback wants to eradicate the long standing right of a husband or wife to make health decisions about their spouse:

Brownback, a Republican with close ties to the party’s social conservative base, said he hoped that in the aftermath of the Schiavo case, states would pass laws making it illegal to withhold food and hydration unless the person authorized otherwise in a living will.

But if states do not take action, Brownback said, he is open to sponsoring legislation that would require it.

Senator Brownback of 2005, meet Senator Brownback of 2003:

“In response to those who are trying to destroy the legal status of marriage, a constitutional response is necessary… We must all work to protect marriage and the family, which comprises the fabric of our society”

Utter hypocrisy from a politician who epitomizes the word. Apparently he only agrees with the rights of marriage when they are used in a manner that he approves.

From the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington comes a report(pdf) on members of Congress who accept campaign donations from porn purveyors. It may surprise some to know that ‘ole Sam was one of the politicians highlighted. You may be asking yourself if this is this the same Sam Brownback who held hearings on the alleged awful effects of pornography on society. Yes. The same.

Sen. Sam Brownback (R-KS) accepted $17,000 in contributions from corporations and executives who profit from pornography… Sen. Brownback held a hearing on pornography addiction in November, 2004. After hearing testimony from experts about how porn affects the brain, Sen. Brownback said, “[i]t is the crack cocaine of sexual addiction” and “its pervasiveness affects our families.” In early 2005, Sen. Brownback praised U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales when he announced he would appeal the dismissal of federal criminal indictments against a California pornography producer, stating “[t]he Justice Department’s decision indicates a renewed effort to go against purveyors of pornography, whose products are so damaging to our culture, our families, and our nation.”

The importance of this is twofold.

1. Brownback’s most ardent supporters are fundamental Christians. His comments and hearings against porn are specifically designed to play to this base. The fact that Brownback accepts funding from pornography purveyors can serve to plant seeds of doubt about Brownback’s true feelings. People do not like a pandering corporate politician, and the more his ties to corporate porn are discussed the better.

2. If there is one thing the voting publics dislikes more than a pandering corporate politician it is a hypocrite. This whole affair reeks with the fresh dollar bill scent of hypocrisy. This flies in the face of the image that Brownback has of a “straight shooter” and a moral, Christian man. This is, in my opinion, the most important angle of this story. Far be it from me to condemn pornography. The discussion of morality is for a different place and time. However anyone feels about the business, the hypocrisy is what is important.